Feb 26 2009

DBS STI ETF Started Trading

DBS STI ETF started trading yesterday.

According to the notice filed by DBS, 2,411,410 units were created at an issue price of $1.62 per unit. This works out to a total fund size of about $3.9 million.

It looks that the amount of funds raised is quite small. As the fund has a minimum trustee fee of $48k per year, this means the expense ratio would exceed 1% (at the current fund size).

Unless DBS can get more institutional interest into this fund, the small fund size will most likely mean it will be a loss making ETF for them.

As a comparison, Streettracks STI ETF has 256 million units in circulation with a fund size of almost $400 million.

  • Share/Bookmark

6 responses so far

6 Responses to “DBS STI ETF Started Trading”

  1. kayon 26 Feb 2009 at 2:26 pm

    Hi,

    That’s a great insight. I didn’t really notice that the expense ratio would exceed 1% due to the small fund size.

    Kay

    Reply

    lioninvestor Reply:

    Saw from the latest notice that they have 25 million units in circulation. So not as bad now.

    Reply

  2. CoGon 15 May 2009 at 4:15 pm

    Hi lioninvestor,

    what does the trustee fee refer to? Izit the amt they pay
    shareholders like us?

    Reply

  3. CoGon 15 May 2009 at 4:28 pm

    Hi lioninvestor,

    Ok I realized how newb that qn was.. did some googling
    and found out the trustee is HSBC. But I still don’t understand
    what the trustee is. What role does it play? How does the fees
    to the trustee affect us?

    Reply

    lioninvestor Reply:

    Hi CoG,

    The trustee holds cash and underlying shares of the ETF for the benefit of the beneficiary.

    The fee paid is from the NAV of the ETF, so the higher the fee, the worse off it is for the ETF investors.

    Reply

    CoG Reply:

    Oh ok. thks.
    So in other words the total fees for the DBS ETF can be said to be
    0.28% as compared to 0.3% for streetTRACKS right?

    I have another qn, would there be a difference in liquidity or would the market maker always ensure liquidity especially in times when there is no willing third party ?

    Reply

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply